ClickCease
Insights

What’s in store for private equity distributions in 2023

Pace of distributions could remain slower this year. However, private market strategies have different realisation schedules, with certain assets demonstrating resilience despite tougher conditions.

Moonfare earliest underlying funds date back to 2018, which means that many of them have started to return capital to our community. As of April 2023, at least half of dozen have already generated distributions. These funds span from large-cap buyouts to growth equity and secondaries strategies. 

Learn more

Distributions are the means by which private equity funds return capital to investors. Learn more about how they work in our recent article.

Find out more

Distributions typically slow down when markets suffer

As the market conditions deteriorated over the past 12 months, however, investors may have been asking themselves what does the new reality mean for the pace of distributions they receive from private market investments. 

Indeed, the pace of distributions can depend a lot on the macroeconomic environment. During times of uncertainty, when selling an asset may not result in an optimal valuation, fund managers may opt to delay realisations. 

Following the public markets volatility of 2022 and with inflation creating a challenging economic environment, for example, exits slowed sharply across all channels, most markedly in the IPO markets (historically, though, the values remained above average, as demonstrated by the graph below).¹ A potentially more subdued activity in 2023 could continue delaying distributions to investors. 

GP-led deals step in 

However, the range of realisation routes allows private equity fund managers some latitude. The GP-led deals, for example, are gaining traction and could make distribution profiles less volatile during this cycle. The value of these deals almost tripled from 2019 to 2021 to $68 billion and even stood at $52 billion in a more difficult 2022.² 

GP-led transactions see fund managers retain what are usually high quality portfolio companies, most frequently by placing them into a new fund, known as a continuation vehicle. Existing investors are offered the option of rolling over their stake or selling it to gain liquidity. This gives GPs additional time to create value in the company or companies while also offering their investors a choice of distributions or a chance to gain from future upside.

start-sidebar

Past recessionary vintages with strongest returns

Private equity has a long history of outperforming public markets investments.³ This holds true through economic cycles, as private equity funds focus on creating value in portfolio companies in good times as well as bad; they have the flexibility on exit timing, which means they can sell at attractive valuations. 

Indeed, some of private equity’s best returns have been a product of recessionary environments. US buyout and growth funds that started investing in the 2001-2003 and 2009-2011 downturns, for example, generated net distributions paid in capital of 2x - investors received back twice the value of their initial investment - according to Cambridge Associates.⁴ 

Note: Internal rates of return are equal weighted and not pooled, and are net of fees, expenses carried interest. Private equity includes buyouts and growth equity funds. Funds less than three years old are considered too young to have produced meaningful returns; those vintages have been excluded from this analysis.
Source: Cambridge Associates 

end-sidebar

Distribution profiles across strategies

While the exit environment slowed down, it’s still important to note that different strategies have different distribution profiles. More defensive strategies such as some private credit funds will continue making distributions as loans are repaid or reach maturity regardless of where we are in the cycle. 

Infrastructure funds can also be more resilient in downturns because of the essential nature of the services provided by their assets and because they may receive inflation-linked income from assets, which they then distribute to investors. 

Let’s look more closely at how distribution profiles vary across private market strategies.

Private credit funds tend to return capital more quickly than other private markets strategies. They receive income from loan repayments and often have fixed maturity dates on their loans—as opposed to having to sell investments to realise a return. This means that distributions from private credit funds are typically more predictable and stable. Private credit fund life cycles are also often shorter than the typical 10-year life cycles seen in buyout funds.

Venture capital investments, by contrast, usually take longer to reach maturity since early-stage companies take time to grow and reach a point where they can either be sold or listed via an IPO. Distributions, therefore, tend to take longer to be received—peaking between year 10 and 12.⁵ In addition, the distribution profile tends to be less predictable with other private markets strategies since VC funds have higher loss rates but also higher potential upside.

Real asset funds, such as those focusing on infrastructure, tend to have extended life cycles of up to 20 years or more because of the long-term nature of the assets and the contracts involved. Their distributions therefore tend to start coming through from year four onwards. Learn more about the characteristics and benefits of private infrastructure funds

Distributions in funds of funds and secondaries 

Other types of vehicles, such as funds of funds and secondaries funds also have different distribution profiles even though they invest in private equity funds themselves.

In funds of funds, distributions flow from the underlying funds to the fund of funds vehicle and then to its investors. Since the initial investments are made over a longer period of time compared to investments made by a single fund, distributions may take longer. Yet the diversification across funds makes distributions more regular and less volatile than those from direct fund investing.

Conversely, secondaries funds tend to make distributions earlier in their lives because they buy up positions in funds or investments that are already part-way through their investment period. Some distributions can come through within the first year, with the majority of funds returning investors’ initial capital by around year eight.⁶  

As we’ve also observed in our 2023 Moonfare Pulse report, secondaries have become increasingly more popular over the past 12 to 18 months. According to our data, 12% of all allocation value in 2022 was targeting secondary opportunities, compared to only 6% a year prior. Given the current climate, the growing interest in secondaries is also not surprising: these investments give investors a recourse to liquidate assets before the end of the fund lifecycle and can function as a lever for more sophisticated cash-flow management.

Stay in the loop

Register for The Satellite, our monthly newsletter on the latest news and private markets analysis.

Sign up now

‍‍‍‍Important notice: This content is for informational purposes only. Moonfare does not provide investment advice. You should not construe any information or other material provided as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. If you are unsure about anything, you should seek financial advice from an authorised advisor. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Subject to eligibility.

Sources

Related Content

Join Moonfare Now.

Benefit from what institutional investors already know: the greatest shareholder value comes from private markets, and funds like those offered on Moonfare have generated an average IRR of 19% — outperforming the S&P 500 by 13%.*

Sign up now

Join The Satellite.

Weekly updates on Investment and Finance.

Subscribe now

* Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

{ "@type": "Person", "name": "Blazej Kupec", "description": "Blazej is a senior content manager at Moonfare. With ten years of experience in financial media, he now covers trends and developments in private equity. Blazej especially enjoys creating content that helps people better understand the intricacies of the asset class. He holds a BSc in Political Science from the University of Ljubljana.", "jobTitle": "Senior Content Manager", "sameAs": [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/blazej-kupec/" ], "knowsAbout": [ "Private Equity", "Venture Capital", "Investing", "Journalism" ], "alumniOf": [ { "@type": "CollegeOrUniversity", "Name": "University of Ljubljana", "sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Ljubljana" } ] }
{ "@type": "Person", "name": "Victoria James", "description": "Victoria is an Investment Manager at Moonfare, focusing on sourcing and due diligence of buyout, growth, venture capital and secondaries funds. Prior to joining Moonfare, she was a Vice President at Softbank Investment Advisors, and started her career as a management consultant at PwC. Victoria holds a BSc in Economics from the University of Nottingham.", "jobTitle": "Investment Manager", "sameAs": ["https://www.linkedin.com/in/victoriarejames/"], "knowsAbout": [ "Deal Sourcing", "Due-Diligence", "Portfolio Management", "Private Equity", "Investing", "Venture Capital", "Secondaries" ], "alumniOf": [ { "@type": "CollegeOrUniversity", "Name": "University of Nottingham", "sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Nottingham" } ] }
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.