Demand for alternative assets in general, and buyouts in particular, remains very strong, with LPs eager to put more capital into the industry. The past year was one of the biggest ever for fund-raising. Investors poured $894 billion into private capital, which includes private equity, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources.
Figure 1: Buyout firms continue to manage more funds, expanding to new asset classes and launching successor funds faster
Notes: Includes 221 buyout firms that have closed more than $2.5 billion in buyout capital funds since 2000; active funds defined as those having held a final close in the seven years preceding each year; other asset classes include growth, venture capital, real estate and infrastructure; predecessor fund analysis based on fund with a predecessor fund only
A recent study analyzed 220 buyout firms, each had raised more than $2.5 billion since 2000, comparing the 2013-19 cycle with 2006-12. Winning firms were defined as those that outperformed the average growth rate of 50% by 40% – in other words, the value of the funds they raised in 2013-19 was at least 70% higher than what they closed in 2006.
Since 2006, the winners’ share of estimated buyout assets under management (AUM) grew by about 20 percentage points (see Figure 2). These outsize capital winners included Apollo, KKR, Platinum and Warburg Pincus.
Figure 2: Top-performing buyout firms’ share of capital has grown almost 20 points since 2006
Notes: Includes 133 buyout firms that have raised more than $5 billion since 2000; AUM calculated as the sum of funds raised in the past seven years; new firms started to raise after 2006
Winners were also oversubscribed by 16%, twice the level of losing firms. The entities that benefited the most from this flight to quality were investors, having increasingly favored larger firms. Buyout firms with solid track records, a clear sector strategy and a distinctive value creation story were clear winers, too. About 70% of winning firms had first or second quartile funds across 2007-14 vintages, vs. 22% for losing firms and about a quarter of the winning firms focused on a single sector, twice the share of losing firms. Consumer- and tech-focused funds did particularly well in fund-raising.
Important notice: This content is for informational purposes only. Moonfare does not provide investment advice. You should not construe any information or other material provided as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. If you are unsure about anything, you should seek financial advice from an authorised advisor. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. Private equity is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Subject to eligibility. Please see https://www.moonfare.com/disclaimers.
* Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.
Please read this important information. By selecting I AGREE this indicates that you have read and understand the below, before accessing the rest of this website.
This disclaimer is intended for UK readers accessing this website who should be aware that Moonfare cannot guarantee all information displayed on its website will be relevant or suitable for UK audiences. Moonfare cannot guarantee the information contained on its website is up to date, and makes best efforts to ensure it sources and data are accurate at the time of publishing.
The information on this website may not be suitable for all investors and we therefore need to ensure that you are sufficiently aware of the risks and are of a suitable category as defined by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
The information set out in this website does not constitute or form part of any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of an offer to subscribe or purchase any investment, nor shall it or the fact of its distribution form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with any contract.